Splunk Enterprise Certified Admin Practice Test

Why might an administrator choose to use Scripted Inputs over other input methods?

1. To enable easier configuration through the UI

2. To collect data types that are non-traditional

3. To rely on built-in protocols for data transfer

4. To limit data collection to on-premises sources

The correct answer is: To collect data types that are non-traditional

Choosing Scripted Inputs is often driven by the need to collect data types that are non-traditional or customized in nature. Scripted Inputs allow administrators to execute custom scripts, which can access data sources that are not supported by standard input methods. This flexibility enables the integration of a wide variety of data formats and sources, such as proprietary applications, specialized logging protocols, or data residing on systems that might not expose their information through conventional means. For example, if an organization uses an application that logs information in a non-standard format, an administrator can create a script that reads this log and processes it into a format that Splunk can ingest. This capability is essential for ensuring that all relevant data can be centralized and analyzed, especially when dealing with diverse IT environments that incorporate custom or less common technologies. In contrast, the other options focus on limitations or features not inherent to the function of Scripted Inputs. For instance, easier UI configuration is generally associated with more standard input methods like file monitoring or network inputs. Relying on built-in protocols does not apply to Scripted Inputs, as the nature of scripting usually means interacting with data in unconventional ways rather than through standardized protocols. Limiting data collection to on-premises sources is not a defining characteristic of